Afghanistan: Marjah? Ulcer? This ain't no bleeding ulcer!

And so the war turns: I highlighted McClatchy’s story on McChrystal and Marjah earlier in the week, wherein the Commander of the International Security Assistance Force (COMISAF, to his friends) was quoted calling Marjah a “bleeding ulcer.” The headline of the story, apparently, didn’t go down well with the folks at ISAF HQ. To wit, Admiral Smith, the chief public relations man in Afghanistan, wrote a letter to the lads at McClatchy:

…The key part of that dialogue that Dion witnessed was “You don’t feel it here, but I’ll tell you, it’s a bleeding ulcer outside.” That would have been further clarified by the quote Dion asked to use (which did not appear in the final edited copy) about Gen. McChrystal being asked in Europe and the U.S. whether we are failing. The essence of the comment is not that Marjah itself is going badly: as he said to Dion in a follow on interview on the plane ride back to Kabul — it’s largely on track. It’s that it’s misperceived to be going badly. It’s a distinction, but one I’m sure you grasp and one that could have been better conveyed, even accounting for the motive of wanting to generate interest in the story using the sensational quote: “McChrystal calls for action against perceptions of ‘bleeding ulcer’ in Marjah,” etc.

Okay, so the command would have preferred a headline of ‘calls for actions against perceptions of ‘bleeding ulcer.’ Editor Roy Gutman responds by standing by the story, and pointing out that, in general, headlines like the one suggested above don’t actually exist.

On the headline, though, we’ve discussed it and do not see it as intellectually dishonest or a mischaracterization. It was drawn from the first part of Gen. McChrystal’s statement; “This is a bleeding ulcer right now,” and your staff cleared that statement. Moreover, in the context of the opening anecdote, which suggested that outside pressures are intense and political leaders have limited patience, the further exchange Gen. McChrystal had about force levels and the facts on the ground, Marjah is a very problematic place in the short term. It adds up to being a “bleeding ulcer.”

Good headlines always pick the most salient point of a story in order to grab reader’s attention, and this one did its job. On the issue of balance, the story portrays Gen. McChrystal’s trip as a reality check for himself, the troops on the ground and the American public. The news was in his warnings to the troops about the level of political impatience in Washington and in Europe with the operation in Marjah. Our reporting back here confirms the accuracy of his assertions.

Advertisements

About michaelhastings

Journalist
This entry was posted in Afghanistan and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Afghanistan: Marjah? Ulcer? This ain't no bleeding ulcer!

  1. Roy Brander says:

    It’s been so long I had to look it up: the Marines entered Marjah on February 12th, about 105 days ago.

    I think it’s fair to call the Marjah-centred offensive a good 10% of the Afghan war effort (15,000 troops), so ascribe to it 10% of the budget, or $7B per year.

    105 days is almost exactly 2/7ths of a year, so they’ve dropped $2 billion dollars on the place so far.

    It has a disputed population between 85,000 and 125,000 so let’s round it to 100,000. The $2B is $20,000 per inhabitant.

    Obama’s calling on the wrong arm of Western Power, clearly: if he’d sent in RE/MAX, they could have BOUGHT the place and paid every farmer to burn their damn poppies and leave.

    For the Riviera.

    Gen. McChrystal is so lucky that we don’t run government like a business. For $2B, any business would expect Marjah to be a completely peaceful and thriving centre of culture with its own symphony orchestra and 3-D IMAX in the mall by now.

    Clearly, this approach isn’t working. They’ve had over a quarter of a year – with one troop for every six inhabitants. If you can’t do it in that long with that much, it’s a very risky proposition to claim you can do it at all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s